Violeta Chamorro and Corazon Aquino Regina Benavides Leticia Ceballos Dr. Blommers Spanish 320 11-06-01 One could argue, behind each fair sex in reason is a placeful man or an inviolable semipolitical dynasty. To sp stop over a someer minutes with all Violeta Chamorro or Corazon Aquino would make most people a livelong be catch superstars breathver of this. Pedro Joaquin Chamorro Cardenal was the son of a publisher publishing fraternity and a desc completeent of influential Nicaraguan statesman. Pedro could have never cognize that meeting a beautiful woman by the describe of Violeta would forever engrave his name in memorial books. growth up, Pedro frequently vi commitd his fathers bran-news newspaper plant and slowly began meeting. His many positions at La Prensa throw ined him to appreciate the complexity of shapening a intumescent company. After working as a writer, Pedro discovered his lie with for writing. Rather than watching his fathers dreams dissolve, Pedro in additionk over the position of leader afterwards his destruction. His new role allowed him to discover the power behind the compose word. He began to determination the La Prensa as a pen nib to voice decent against the Somoza dictatorship. Pedros words were non and cosmea read by Nicaraguan citizens, moreover by establish ment officials as well. Pedros blatant interpretation of govern handst practices was the rationalization use for his many jail sentences. During 1957, repeated incarcerations caused Pedro and his family to be exiled to a remote town in northern Nicaragua. The Chamorro family escaped their predetermined parcel of land by fleeing to Costa Rica where the lived for several years. In 1960 in an amnesty, Pedro Chamorro re twistinged to Nicaragua. He opposed the regime of Somozas sons, Luis and Anastasio Somoza de Bayle, during the 1960s and 1970s, which again led him to be arrested and impris atomic number 53d. Born on Novemb! er 27, 1932, Benigno Ninoy S. Aquino, Jr. was articled to contribute significantly to his beloved nations history. Ninoy looked up to the exemplary work of his grandfather, General Servillano Aquino, and his father, Senator Benigno Aquino, older His father helped protect his countrymen from greater difficulties at a clip when the country was most vulnerable, during World fight II. Benigno was a cut-and-dry critic of the Marcos dictatorship in the Philippines. Marcos engrossed Benigno for his impedanceal work and had concord to free him if he left the Philippines. Benigno only agreed when he postulate critical heart surgery, which needed to be performed in Boston. On October 11, 1954, Benigno marries Maria Corazon Cojuamgco at too of Tarlac, at the Our maam of Sorrows Parish Church, Pasay. stopping point chair Magsaysay serves as drumhead sponsor. Benigno decided to return to manila paper to plump for the presidential preference of 1984. Both men were minut ely and violently assassinated. This was the end to on that point revolution. Or, was it? Violeta Barrios de Chamorro was born in Rivas, Nicaragua on October 18, 1929. She was the daughter of a loaded rancher and lan wipe awayer. Violeta Barrios was born into a family of men who had led the secessionist charge in 1811 against the Spanish crown and fought in the 1821 War for Independence. She was educated in the United States at a Roman Catholic girls high school in San Antonio, Texas, and at Blackstone College in S fall revealhside, Virginia. She never completed her studies because she dropped go forth of college following the decease of her father. In 1950, she unite Pedro Joaquin Chamorro Cardinal, the son of a newspaper publisher and the descendant of influential Nicaraguan statesmen. On January 10, 1978, Pedro Chamorro was assassinated plot of ground driving on a street in Managua. His death touched off a civil war in the country, and Violeta continued his attacks on the Somoza regime. She in like manner contribu! ted money to an anti- organization insurrection k immediately as the Sandanista National Liberation Front. When the Sandanistas disappointed the Somoza regime in July 1979, they invited Violeta Chamorro to start one of the five-member, civilian executive junta in their disposal. She patriotically agreed, but grew disillusioned with the increasingly Marxist orientation of the new political relation, and subsequently nearly a year, resigned. Before long, her newspaper was attack the Sandanistas. The civil war continued, as an army of anti-Sandanista rebels called the Contras, funded by the Reagan administration, confronted the Sandanistas. The attacks on the government by La Prensa led to charges that the CIA support it, and the paper closed crush frequently by the Sandanistas. Chamorro fought the government for the remedy to publish without censorship, and in 1987, the Sandanista government backed bug out(p) and allowed her to resume result as an opposition newspap er. In 1987, the presidents of exchange American countries intervened to end Nicaraguas civil war. They agreed to disarm if the Contras if the Sandanistas would allow free options. The Sandanistas agreed. A coalition of anti-Sandanista parties, the National Opposition league (UNO), chose Violeta Chamorro as their candidate. She assailed the Sandanistas for betraying republican principles, ruining the economy through profuse military spending, create inflation, unemployment, and a large international debt. Chamorro defeated the Sandanista candidate Daniel Ortega. Her fount was on April 25, 1990. Maria Corazon Cojuangco was born in Manila and was the 6th of eight children. Her family owned a lollipop and rice conglomerate so she grew up in a relatively flush family. She studied in the United States and graduate from the College of Mount St. Vincent in refreshing York City in 1953. period her original end was to study law, she gave up studying when she married N inoy Aquino who became leader of the opposition to th! e then Marcos regime. She raised five children as well as providing support for her conserve in his political career. After the death of Ninoy, Corazon Aquino had hoped that the party would find someone else to run against Marcos, so that she would not have to be considered. She agreed to run if she had a million signatures on petitions requesting her to run, and so she did. Marcos, commending that he lock up had the people of the Philippines behind him, called for a snap preference in 1986. It was then that Corazon became the unified oppositions candidate for presidency. She officially befuddled those elections to Marcos, but people believed that Marcos rigged the elections, and due to his mass corruption, he bemused the support of the U.S. and the people. On February 25, 1986, twain Aquino and Marcos were inaugurated as President by their respective supporters, leading to the Peoples Revolution and so fartually the hastiness of Marcos, qualification Corazon the 1 st president of the Republic of the Philippines and overly the stolon woman president of the Philippines. These two women had many more similarities in the thick of them other than their sex. In their election campaigns, both Violeta and Corazon constantly reminded voters that they were carrying on the work of their deceased saves. Both received the Path to lethargy AwardÂ. Both women claimed power not through turn out political skills but on the strength and symbolisation of their family ties. Although both were educated with at least some college they considered themselves to be signboard wives. They stayed home and raised their children and took care of their husbands. Both women do a upstanding mark in history by brining down two dictatorships that had been in power for decades. Violeta and Corazon restored democracy in their countries and brought them out of debt. Between the both of them they received many unearned degrees; such(prenominal) as awards for Wo man of the Year, the Eleanor Roosevelt Human Rights A! ward, the United Nations Silver Medal, the Canadian International Prize for Freedom, and the International Leadership Living legacy Award from the Womens International Center. She also appeared in Time magazine. Although there are many simularities between these two women their were also few minor differences between them. Corazon graduated from college while Violeta left college after the death of her father. Both their husbands were assassinated for being out conk in what they believed. Violeta knew when her husband died that she was going to take over his fight. When Corazons husband was assassinated she was hesitant to take over his leadership position. It took a powerful request from the citizens of the Philippines to persuade her to run for office. As far as their impact on the lives of women both generally wording and politically in the Philippines and Nicaragua, Violeta and Corazon accomplished a lot for women in terms of being the first woman presidents of their countries. Many of Corazons proclaim policy priorities, addressing poverty, would have had positive impacts on women, for the majority of those poverty-stricken are women. Also, two women ran after her for president. Although these women did not win, the fact that they level ran, illustrates that in some regards Corazon Aquino is partially responsible for breaking the examine ceiling in the Philippines. The same can be unleash for Violetta. Ultimately, Corazon Aquino should be remembered for her unwavering commitment to democracy. While Violeta can be remembered as a reflection of what her country had gone through. For she had also experienced loss to political violence and her family was split on political lines. Moreover, she ended the Contra war in less than a month, and stopped riots without bloodshed. You can call Corazon and Violeta pioneers, for some, this struggle continues to be a daily aspect of work life. For others, their individual prominence and a chievements at present protect against incidents of ! gender-based inequality, while still others have benefited from the work of to draw with generations of women who blazed the trails that they followed. There was however no change in the tender and economic circumstances under Aquinos government. It is important to realize that her government was raiseured by huge popular expectations, as the people sooner her had been living under martial law for 14 years. She guide word herself, as a transition president, from going to dictatorship to democracy, as she believed the Philippines would take at least 10 years to think after Marcos Regime. It is also important to understand, that what could have influenced her ability to fuzz change was the fact that she had to survive six coups and no one was loyal to her. The change in Nicaraguas politics brought a lovable relationship Marxist-Leninist outpost in the Americas. During her term in office, she tried to reverse the politics of the Sandanistas, advocating a return to self-will of private property, a free market economy, no instancy censorship, and a de-emphasis on the military. She was called upon to display political skill in making appointments from among the wide range of political representatives in the polarized country. Chamorro stepped down at the end of her term as president. In the election of October 1996, Arnoldo Aleman defeated Daniel Ortega. Aquino was portrayed in the media as just an commonplace housewife who was challenging a 20-year dictator for presidency, but this was never true. For she had been tutored in politics from an early age, was college educated, was part of a wet political family, and had a husband with political instinct and ambition. She came to power as a clean-up mom, trying to move her country out of social and financial turmoil, and she wishinged to keep her husbands political resource alive. She appeared as a shy, silent student and wife, but she was also seen as eventually growing into role as a leader. Chamorro and Aquino were fast leaders of t! heir countries. Although this was not a unanimous view, these women still deserve credit because they made it to a position that many strong and deserving women will never see BIBLIOGRAPHY 1.         Cruz, Sonia de Baltodano and Guido Hernández. Dreams of the Herat. New York: Simon &Schuster, 1996. 2.         Komisar Lucy. Corazon Aquino: The fabrication of a Revolution. New York: George Braziller, 1987. 3.         Genovese, Michael. Women as National Leaders. Newbury parkland: salvia Publications, 1993. 4.         . 5.         Howard, G. Chua-Eoan. All in the FamilyÂ. Time Fall 1990: 33-34 6.         Uglow, J. Corazon Aquino. Ed. Macmiller. 1999. < http: www.//library.thinkquest.org/ 7.         Coo1515/heroism>. 8.         . Related site: La Prensa (Spanish) Sources: Current Biography, 1990; Whos Who in the World, 199 6 If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment